Overview
-
Background & Policy Context: Following criminal justice initiatives since the 1990s and the Domestic Violence, Crimes and Victims Act 2004, police policy in the UK has increasingly emphasized pro-arrest approaches, positive action, and identifying primary aggressors to prevent inappropriate dual arrests.
-
Methodology: The research tracked three comparative samples totaling 96 cases (126 individual perpetrators) across a 6-year period:
-
32 Sole Female Perpetrators
-
32 Sole Male Perpetrators
-
32 Dual Perpetrator Cases (where both male and female partners were recorded as perpetrators across separate incidents)
-
Key Findings:
-
Incident Frequency & Repeat Perpetration: Men were significantly more likely to be repeat perpetrators, accounting for up to 52 incidents in a single case. 83% of male perpetrators had two or more recorded incidents, whereas 62% of female perpetrators had only one recorded incident.
-
Nature of Abuse: Male perpetrators were significantly more likely to use physical violence (61% vs 37%), threats (29% vs 13%), and harassment (29% vs 11%), creating an ongoing context of fear and coercive control. Female perpetrators were more likely to use weapons (24% vs 11%), often defensibly or to stop further violence from partners.
-
Arrests & Legal Outcomes: Women were arrested disproportionately relative to their number of incidents—arrested once every 3 incidents (32%), compared to men who were arrested once every 10 incidents (11%). However, men were more likely to be charged or cautioned (25% vs 8%).
-
Trends: The data showed a slight increase over time in the proportion of women recorded (8% to 12%) and arrested (9% to 11%) as domestic violence perpetrators, echoing similar but more pronounced trends observed in the US following mandatory arrest policies.
Key Recommendations
-
Primary Aggressor Identification: Police officers must be trained and guided to accurately identify the primary aggressor in domestic violence incidents involving counter-allegations or dual reporting, ensuring victims using self-defense or violent resistance are not misidentified as primary perpetrators.
-
Context-Sensitive Risk Assessment: Criminal justice agencies should evaluate domestic abuse as a pattern of coercive control over time rather than as isolated incidents, taking full account of severity, impact, and fear dynamics when assessing risk.
-
Proportional System Response: Police recording practices and arrest protocols should address the disproportionate arrest rate of female perpetrators relative to their fewer incidents and defensive contexts.
-
Inter-Agency Support Alignment: Support services and health agencies must collaborate closely with police, particularly where substance misuse, mental health, or child protection issues intersect with domestic abuse incidents.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates clear gender asymmetries in domestic violence perpetration. While both men and women appear in police records as perpetrators, male abuse is far more frequent, severe, and coercive over time, whereas female perpetration is predominantly single-incident, less severe, or defensive in nature. The findings highlight the necessity of nuanced, gender-informed police practices and policy responses to prevent victim criminalization while ensuring robust intervention against high-risk repeat abusers.